A tutor matched to your child's exact IB English course — Literature or Language and Literature, HL or SL — with sessions built around Paper 1, Paper 2, the Individual Oral and the HL Essay, not a generic reading list. Online worldwide, or in person depending on tutor availability in your city.
Matched by programme, subject, level, weak areas and your school's calendar.
Math AA, Math AI, Physics, Chemistry, Economics, English and more, to the current syllabus.
Online worldwide around school hours, with home and hybrid options where tutors are local.
Clear updates on what was covered, what needs practice and the next step.
IB English tutors help students in Grade 6 through Grade 12 handle two demands at once: close reading under IB command terms, and the written or oral output the syllabus grades — Paper 1 commentary, Paper 2 essays, the Individual Oral, the HL Essay. Searching for a tutor usually means one of three things: a Literature or Language and Literature gap, IA or IO anxiety before a deadline, or marks slipping against the criteria. IB Gram matches a subject-qualified tutor to the level and paper mix your school teaches, online worldwide or in person depending on availability.
Matching starts with specifics, not a general request for an English tutor. IB Gram asks for the course (Literature or Language and Literature), the level (HL or SL), the grade, and what the family actually needs help with right now — IO preparation, IA or coursework structure, past-paper technique, or general syllabus support across the year. That detail changes which tutors are even considered; a tutor strong on HL Essay supervision is not the right match for a Grade 6 student building basic annotation habits. Once a shortlist is drawn up, subject background and relevant exam-board familiarity are checked against what the family described, not against a generic English-teaching resume. A first session is diagnostic rather than instructional: the tutor reviews recent work, asks the student to talk through a short passage using command terms, and identifies where the specific gap sits — evidence use, structure, time management, or confidence under exam conditions. From that, a plan gets set for the following four to six weeks, with concrete, checkable goals rather than a vague promise of improvement. Fit is reviewed early and honestly. If a tutor's teaching style and the student's learning style do not click within the first few sessions, this is treated as normal and correctable, not as failure on either side, and a different tutor is proposed rather than persisting through a mismatch that scheduling logic alone will not fix.
Matching starts from course, level, grade and current need
First session is diagnostic: recent work, a command-terms discussion, gap identified
A four-to-six-week plan follows, with checkable goals
Mismatch in the first sessions gets a tutor change, not persistence
Learn with verified tutors matched for IB English, with strong exam support, fast feedback, and structured preparation.
Math AAHL
IB + IGCSE
Australia
United States+2 more
Mathematics
IB + IGCSE
English Language and Literature
IB + IGCSE
IB Gram works with families from Grade 6 to Grade 12, which in practice spans two different programmes with different assessment logic. MYP Language and Literature, roughly Grade 6 through Grade 10, is assessed against four criteria — analysing, organising, producing text, and using language — set by the school within IB's broader framework, and criterion-related rather than norm-referenced: a student is measured against a fixed standard, not ranked against classmates. The Diploma Programme, Grade 11 and 12, narrows into the paper-and-IO structure described above, run against IB's own external moderation. The two do not always transition smoothly. A student who scored well against MYP criteria can still find DP's timed, closed-book Paper 2 unfamiliar territory, because MYP allows more scaffolding and choice of text than DP's fixed exam conditions. Concept-based learning threads through both programmes — students are expected to connect a text to bigger ideas like identity, culture or power, not just comprehend it — and academic honesty rules apply from MYP onward, which matters directly for any tutor helping with an essay or IA: guidance on structure and argument is normal support, writing content that gets submitted as the student's own is not, and a tutor who blurs that line is a liability, not a help. Internal assessment and coursework deadlines are set by each individual school, not by IB centrally, so a tutor working to a generic calendar is working from an assumption rather than your school's actual dates.
MYP Language and Literature: roughly Grade 6-10, four assessment criteria
DP English: Grade 11-12, external paper-and-IO structure
Concept-based learning runs through both programmes
Academic honesty limits apply to any tutor helping with an IA or essay
IB English at Diploma level runs as two related but separate courses: Language A: Literature, built entirely around literary texts, and Language A: Language and Literature, which mixes literary and non-literary text types — adverts, speeches, editorials — with literature. Both are offered at Higher Level and Standard Level, and the difference is not just more reading at HL. It is an HL Essay of 1,200 to 1,500 words on independent literary analysis, plus deeper comparative range across Paper 2. Paper 1 asks for a guided analysis of unseen text; Paper 2 asks for a comparative essay across two studied works, written from memory, no text in the room. The Individual Oral sits apart from both papers: a recorded fifteen-minute conversation linking a global issue to two works, assessed against its own criteria for understanding, analysis, focus and organisation, and language. A tutor who is strong on Paper 2 essay structure is not automatically strong on IO delivery, which is closer to spoken argument than written prose, or on HL Essay research skills, which reward independent source use IB is strict about crediting properly. Before committing to a tutor, it is worth asking directly which of these four components — Paper 1, Paper 2, IO, HL Essay — they actually teach well, rather than assuming general English tutoring covers all four equally.
Language A: Literature vs Language A: Language and Literature
HL Essay: 1,200-1,500 words, independent literary analysis
Paper 1: unseen guided analysis; Paper 2: comparative essay, closed text
Individual Oral: recorded, 15 minutes, its own assessment criteria
Online tutoring removes geography from the equation almost entirely: a specialist Language A: Literature tutor can work with a student in one time zone from a base in another, and most IB English tutoring on the platform runs this way by default. Home and hybrid sessions are different, because they depend on a suitable tutor actually being reachable within a family's city. Families researching a tutor from cities such as Delhi, Bangalore, Chennai, Ahmedabad, Chandigarh, Bhopal, Bhubaneswar, Coimbatore, Dehradun, Faridabad, Ghaziabad or Greater Noida can request home or hybrid tutoring, and availability is checked at the point of enquiry rather than promised in advance — a family in one part of a city may have several suitable tutors within reasonable travel distance, while a family in a less-served pocket of the same city may find only one, or none, which is exactly where online tutoring becomes the more reliable option rather than a fallback. This is not a limitation specific to English; it is true of home tutoring generally, and IB English is no exception. What is specific to English is that the subject rewards continuity with one tutor across a full academic year far more than a subject like Mathematics does, because essay and IO feedback compounds — a tutor who has already read three of a student's essays gives sharper feedback than one reading their first. That continuity argument favours choosing an online-capable specialist match over a nearby but less well-matched local tutor, in most cases.
Online tutoring is available regardless of city or time zone
Home and hybrid depend on a suitable tutor being reachable locally
Enquiries from cities including Delhi, Bangalore and Chennai are checked individually
Continuity with one tutor across the year matters more in English than in some other subjects
A tutor's job in IB English is to support what the school is already teaching, not to replace it or run a separate curriculum alongside it. That starts with the basics: the tutor should ask what text list the school has set, which criteria version the school is using for IA or coursework, and when the school's own internal deadlines fall, since IB does not set these centrally and one school's mock exam timetable can differ from another's by weeks. A tutor who ignores this and works from a generic syllabus overview is not saving time; they are creating a second, conflicting version of the course for the student to reconcile. Academic honesty is the other place this matters directly. Any IA, coursework or HL Essay support has to stay on the right side of a clear line: helping a student understand a mark scheme, structure an argument, or revise their own draft is legitimate tutoring; writing content that gets submitted as the student's own work is not, and schools do check for this. IB Gram is an independent tutoring platform and is not officially affiliated with the IB Organization, Cambridge International or Pearson Edexcel, and does not claim to speak for any individual school's policies or specific text choices. Families should treat the school as the authority on curriculum specifics, and the tutor as support built around whatever that school has actually set.
Ask early which text list, criteria version and internal deadlines the school uses
A tutor should adapt to the school's syllabus, not run a parallel one
Academic honesty: help with structure and argument, not submitted content
IB Gram is independent, not affiliated with IB, Cambridge or Pearson Edexcel
Online tutoring is the default for IB English for one plain reason: subject depth matters more here than proximity. A Language A: Literature specialist who knows the IO criteria cold is worth more than a generalist English tutor who happens to live two streets away, and online access means that specialist is available regardless of which city, or which country, the family is in — sessions run in the family's own time zone, wherever the school itself is based. Home tutoring still has a real place. Younger students, particularly in the MYP years, often concentrate better with a tutor physically in the room, without a screen and its notifications competing for attention, and annotating a shared paper copy of a text is still easier face to face than over a shared screen. Home tutoring depends on a suitable tutor being available for in-person sessions in that city, which is not guaranteed the way online availability is. Hybrid plans are common for exam years: weekly online sessions for regular paper practice, with occasional in-person sessions timed around a mock exam or IA deadline, when working through handwritten annotation together in the same room is worth the scheduling effort. None of these is objectively correct. A Grade 7 student new to annotation may do better in person; a Grade 12 student refining Paper 2 timing technique with a specific specialist may do better online with that exact tutor, wherever they are.
Online: widest access to subject specialists, any time zone
Home: suits younger students, depends on local tutor availability
Hybrid: online weekly, in-person around mocks or IA deadlines
Match the mode to the student's age and exam stage, not habit
Vetting an English tutor is not the same exercise as vetting a Maths or Physics tutor, and it should not be treated as one. Subject qualification is checked first — a genuine background in English literature or literary studies, not simply fluency in the language, since teaching Paper 2 comparative structure is a different skill from correcting grammar. Exam-board familiarity is checked next: has the tutor actually taught to IB's specific command terms and criteria, or is their experience with a different syllabus being adapted on the fly? This distinction matters more in English than in most subjects, because IB's assessment criteria — organisation, language, analysis, understanding — are worded specifically and marked against IB's own descriptors, not against generic essay-writing standards a tutor may have learned elsewhere. Teaching history is reviewed where available, along with how a tutor describes their own approach to feedback, since vague answers here, such as 'I help students improve', are a weaker signal than a tutor who can describe, concretely, how they mark a mock Paper 1 or structure an IO practice session. None of this produces a guarantee of results; no responsible tutoring platform can honestly offer one. But it does mean a family is not starting from a cold search and a set of unverifiable claims. What a parent should expect at introduction is a short account of the tutor's relevant background and how it maps onto the specific need described at matching.
Subject qualification in English literature or literary studies, not just fluency
Exam-board familiarity with IB's own command terms and criteria
Concrete description of feedback method, not a vague claim
No guaranteed outcome: verification reduces risk, it does not remove it
A Grade 6 student reading a short story for MYP Language and Literature is being trained in something specific: noticing how a writer's choices create meaning, and saying so using the vocabulary IB calls command terms — analyse, evaluate, examine, justify. That habit does not appear on its own. It gets built session by session, usually through annotation drills a class of twenty-five rarely has time for. By Grade 11 and 12, the same habit has to carry weight under exam pressure: a Paper 1 guided literary analysis done cold, in fifty minutes, on a text the student has never seen. Students who struggle at DP level are frequently repeating a Grade 8 or 9 gap nobody closed — weak textual evidence, a habit of summarising plot instead of arguing a point, or discomfort with unseen text under time pressure. This is why a tutor search that starts in Grade 11 sometimes moves faster than one that starts earlier: the problem is more visible, even if it took years to form. And it is why a family looking earlier, in Grade 7 or 8, should treat that as an advantage rather than jump straight to exam drilling. What matters when choosing a tutor is less about credentials on paper and more about whether the tutor can name, precisely, which of these habits is missing in your child's writing right now, with a plan for that specific gap rather than a generic revision pack.
Command terms: analyse, evaluate, examine, justify, discuss
MYP Language and Literature builds the habit DP later tests under pressure
A Grade 11 gap is often a Grade 8 habit never corrected
Look for a tutor who names the specific gap, not a generic pack
Tutoring changes how a student prepares, argues and revises. It does not change how IB assesses. No tutor, however well matched, can promise a specific grade, a 7, or a fixed point improvement, and any that does is making a claim the assessment system does not support — final marks depend on external moderation the tutor has no access to. What a good match reliably delivers is more modest and more checkable: sharper use of textual evidence, a clearer sense of what each command term is actually asking for, faster and more structured Paper 1 and Paper 2 practice, and an IO the student can deliver without reading from notes. Four weeks in, a parent should be able to see concrete change, not a report card, but a visible shift in how the student annotates a text, plans an essay under time pressure, or talks about a work out loud. If that shift is not visible by then, it is worth raising directly with the tutor rather than assuming more time will fix it; sometimes it will, sometimes the match itself needs revisiting. One honest limitation: a tutor starting with a Grade 12 student three weeks before the May session can improve exam technique meaningfully, but cannot rebuild three years of reading habits in that window, and a family in that position is better served by tightly scoped exam-technique sessions than by a plan that promises more than the timeline allows.
No guaranteed grades or point improvements; moderation is external
Checkable four-week signals: evidence use, essay planning, oral delivery
Raise a stalled match directly rather than waiting it out
Starting weeks before exams limits scope to technique, not habit-building
Getting started does not require deciding on a mode, a schedule or a tutor in advance. It starts with a short description of the course, level, grade and current concern, whether that is a looming IO, a slipping Paper 2 score, or simply a Grade 7 student who needs steadier reading habits before DP arrives. From there, a shortlist is drawn against subject background and exam-board familiarity, availability is confirmed for online, home or hybrid depending on the family's city and preference, and a first diagnostic session is arranged. That first session is where the real decision gets made, not before it, on the strength of a profile alone. Families in a city with several IB schools nearby often assume home tutoring will be easy to arrange; sometimes it is, and sometimes the better-matched specialist for that exact course and level is only available online, which is worth knowing before ruling it out on principle. Either way, nothing about starting the process commits a family to a long-term plan before the fit has actually been tested in a real session. A four-to-six-week review point follows naturally, by which time the direction should be visibly working, or worth adjusting.
Describe course, level, grade and current concern to start
Shortlist checked against subject background and exam-board familiarity
First session is diagnostic, not a commitment
Review at four to six weeks; adjust the plan or the tutor if needed
IB Gram is an independent tutoring platform and is not officially affiliated with the IB Organization, Cambridge International or Pearson Edexcel.
Fees vary by tutor experience, level (HL typically costs a little more than SL because of the HL Essay and extra reading load), and whether sessions are online or in person, with online usually more cost-efficient since travel is not being charged for. IB Gram does not fix a single rate; a specific quote is confirmed once a tutor is matched to your course and grade, and depends on tutor availability and session frequency. Ask for per-session and package pricing before committing, and confirm whether IA or IO-focused sessions are billed the same as regular syllabus sessions.
Yes, for most students, with one caveat: annotation-heavy early sessions can feel less natural on screen than with a shared paper text. Essay structure, Paper 1 and Paper 2 technique, and IO rehearsal all translate well online, and the IO itself is a recorded conversation, so practising it over video is close to the real format. What matters more than online versus in person is whether the tutor gives specific, written feedback the student can revisit, rather than only verbal comments during the session that get forgotten by the next one.
This is common enough that IB Gram treats it as routine, not as a failure to fix quietly. Raise it within the first two or three sessions rather than waiting through a term hoping it improves, since early mismatch rarely resolves on its own in a subject like English where feedback style matters. A replacement tutor is matched based on what specifically did not work, whether that is pacing, feedback style, or subject emphasis, so the same mismatch is not repeated. There is no penalty for asking, and doing it early costs far less time than persisting.
Yes, within a clear boundary. A tutor can explain the assessment criteria, discuss structure, review a draft and point out where argument or evidence is weak, and that is legitimate support most schools expect students to seek. A tutor writing content, sentences or analysis that gets submitted as the student's own is not permitted, and schools do check for this. If a tutor ever offers to write part of an assignment, treat that as a signal to end the arrangement, not as a convenience worth accepting.
Not too late for meaningful improvement in exam technique, timing and command-term precision, but it is too late to rebuild years of reading habits from scratch. Three months is enough time for focused Paper 1 and Paper 2 practice, IO rehearsal, and mark-scheme familiarity to lift performance visibly. What it will not do is turn a student who rarely reads closely into one with deep literary instinct by May. Being honest about that distinction upfront helps set a realistic, achievable plan rather than an overreaching one.
Yes, and it affects who should tutor your child. Literature focuses entirely on literary texts and closer textual analysis across a longer reading list. Language and Literature adds non-literary text types, such as adverts, opinion pieces and speeches, and asks students to compare how meaning is constructed differently across text types, a distinct skill from literary analysis alone. A tutor strong in one is not automatically strong in the other, so confirm which course your child is actually studying before matching, not just that they need general 'English' help.
Both, depending on tutor availability where you are. Online is available everywhere and worldwide, in your own time zone, and is the default for most families because it gives access to specialists regardless of location. Home tutoring is checked city by city; families researching from Delhi, Bangalore, Chennai, Ahmedabad and other cities can request it, and IB Gram confirms whether a suitably matched tutor is reachable for in-person sessions before committing either way. A hybrid mix of both is common for exam years.
The first session is diagnostic, not a straight jump into new content. The tutor reviews recent essays or IA drafts, asks the student to talk through a short passage using IB command terms, and identifies specifically where marks are being lost, whether that is weak evidence, unclear structure, timing under exam pressure, or nerves around speaking for the IO. From that, a four-to-six-week plan is set with concrete goals, so both the parent and the tutor have something specific to check progress against, rather than a vague sense of getting better.
No, and in some ways it is the easier stage to fix habits in, because MYP marking allows more time and scaffolding than DP's timed exams do later. Early tutoring at this stage usually focuses on annotation, using command terms accurately, and building comfort with unfamiliar texts, rather than exam drilling. Students who build these habits before Grade 10 tend to find the jump into DP's Paper 1 and Paper 2 format less jarring, since the underlying skill was already there before the exam pressure was added on top.
Raise it directly with the tutor at the four-week mark rather than waiting until a mock exam reveals it. Ask specifically what has changed in the student's evidence use, essay planning or oral confidence, since these are checkable even before grades move. Sometimes the fix is a change in feedback style or session frequency; sometimes the tutor genuinely is not the right match, and a change is made without treating it as wasted time. What should not happen is continuing for months on the assumption that more of the same will eventually work.
Tell us the IB English course, level and grade, and what is actually going wrong right now — an IO, an IA, or general exam technique. IB Gram checks tutor background and availability, then arranges a first diagnostic session, online, at home, or hybrid, depending on your city and schedule.
Book a Free Consultation